OCC AI Claims Software Claim Watch For Litigation Funders POWERED BY UK FINANCIAL CLAIM INTELLIGENCE OCC AI Claims Software UK Financial Claims Index POWERED BY UK FINANCIAL CLAIM INTELLIGENCE OCC AI Claims Software Claim Passports POWERED BY UK FINANCIAL CLAIM INTELLIGENCE

Litigation funding without live data is not due diligence. It is optimism with a chequebook.

ClaimPassports gives litigation funders live, independently scored visibility into every portfolio they back. Before commitment. Every day after.

Litigation funders commit capital against claim portfolios they cannot fully see. ClaimPassports changes that. Every claim scored. Every firm monitored. Every portfolio transparent in real time. This briefing sets out why ClaimPassports is not an optional platform choice for the firms in your portfolio: it is your due diligence infrastructure.

1.4M
Claims processing capacity per month
7%
Monthly volume growth
12
Live claims products
35
Sub-products
ClaimPassports · Live Data Constellation
Every node is a live data signal. Every connection is a scoring relationship. Hover any node to explore the intelligence layer.
01

The problem every funder already knows

You commit capital against claim books assessed at a point in time. The due diligence window gives you a snapshot. But claims are not static assets. They age, move through regulatory schemes, gain or lose evidential weight, and fluctuate in expected return as lender conduct findings develop. Once your capital is deployed, most funders are operating on faith, monthly management reports from the firms themselves, and whatever the solicitor's PI insurer is willing to tell you at review. That is not a portfolio management model. That is a prayer.

RISK 01
Opaque claim books at the point of commitment
You price a portfolio from submitted data. No independent scoring. No standardised evidential grading. Firms present their strongest cases and hope you do not ask too many questions about the rest.
RISK 02
No live monitoring after capital is deployed
Portfolio health changes. Regulatory developments shift claim values. Firms hit operational capacity walls. You find out about deterioration in the quarterly review, not the week it starts happening.
RISK 03
Inconsistent processing standards across firms
One firm runs a clean, scored pipeline. Another processes files manually with no standardised claim quality grading. Your capital is exposed to the second firm's methodology, not just its case law.
RISK 04
No early warning system for portfolio deterioration
Drop-off rates, score degradation, FOS rejection patterns, lender hardening: these signals are visible in platform data long before they surface in a solicitor's management report.
RISK 05
Regulatory scheme changes without portfolio recalibration
Regulatory scheme changes, conduct findings, and court rulings shift claim values and routing decisions continuously. Whether motor finance redress, packaged accounts, pension mis-selling, or commercial litigation, firms without live platform data cannot recalibrate fast enough when the picture moves.
RISK 06
No standardised data output for portfolio comparison
You fund across multiple firms in the same claim category. They give you different formats, different definitions, and different quality thresholds. Comparison across your portfolio is impossible without a shared data standard.
02

What funders look for, and how the platform delivers it

Every litigation funder applies the same five assessment criteria when evaluating a claim portfolio. ClaimPassports was built to produce precisely the data those five criteria require, automatically, at claim level and at portfolio level, before you commit and every day after.

💰
Damages Assessment
Expected Portfolio Return Score
Funders evaluate potential returns against expected damages. The platform's EPR engine models likely settlement value, lender or defendant propensity to settle, regulatory route probability, and processing timeline at claim level. Every claim carries a live expected return score. Portfolio-level EPR distribution gives you an aggregated damages view without relying on the firm's own estimate.
📅
Budget and Timeline
Processing Velocity and Cost Signals
A detailed budget and timeline are crucial for funder assessment. ClaimWatch surfaces intake velocity, processing throughput, document completion rates, and submission pipeline status in real time. You see exactly how fast the firm is processing, where the bottlenecks are, and what the expected resolution timeline looks like across the funded cohort, without waiting for a management report.
🔍
Recoverability Analysis
Lender and Defendant Capacity Intelligence
Funders assess the respondent's financial strength and recovery prospects post-win. The platform's lender cohort data and defendant capacity modelling inform EPR scores at the lender and claim type level. Recovery rate data from settled claims feeds back into platform scoring, building a continuously improving recoverability intelligence layer across the funded portfolio.
⚖️
Strength of Legal Claims
Evidential Strength Profile Score
Solid documentation and legal arguments determine case credibility. The platform's ESP engine scores every claim on evidential strength based on product type, lender conduct evidence, commission structure, and documentation completeness. Document generation completion rates are visible at claim level. No claim with incomplete documentation can enter a funded cohort without a flag. Legal strength is scored, not assumed.
📋
Factual Evidence
Document Completeness and Audit Trail
Financial statements, contracts, and supporting evidence are the foundation of any fundable claim. The platform validates evidence completeness at intake, flags gaps before they reach the score engine, and maintains a full audit trail per claim. Letters of authority, FOS submissions, and claim documents are generated automatically from validated records. The evidence layer is built into the platform workflow, not assembled at the point of funder request.
🎯
Portfolio Packaging
Passport Intelligence Score
Strategically packaging a case and addressing funder criteria determines success. The composite Passport Intelligence Score combines ESP and EPR into a single banded rating per claim. PIS distribution across your funded cohort is the definitive portfolio package: standardised, independently produced, and directly comparable across every firm on the platform. The funder sees the whole picture at once.
03

ClaimPassports as funder infrastructure

ClaimPassports is not a tool that helps solicitors manage their files. It is a platform that makes every claim in a firm's book readable, scored, and monitored to a consistent standard in real time. For a litigation funder, that is a fundamental change in what you can see, when you can see it, and how you price what you are buying.

The Core Proposition
Every claim you fund, scored and visible before you commit and every day after.

When the firms in your portfolio run ClaimPassports, you gain read-level visibility of a live, AI-scored claim register. Not a summary prepared for you by the firm. Not a spreadsheet exported at month end. A live data layer covering claim type, ESP score, EPR score, Passport Intelligence Score, processing status, document generation completeness, FOS submission readiness, and regulatory scheme eligibility. This is the infrastructure that turns portfolio monitoring from a quarterly exercise into a continuous signal.

📋
Zero-Touch Intake
Volume Onboarding
Claims enter the platform automatically with no manual processing step. Intake volume scales without proportional headcount increase. Every record is validated at entry and flagged for gaps before it reaches the score engine.
📊
ESP Scoring
Evidential Strength Profile
Every claim receives a scored evidential strength profile assessing the financial product, the lender, the commission structure, and the available conduct evidence. Score is produced at claim entry and recalculated as new evidence is added.
📈
EPR Scoring
Expected Portfolio Return
The expected portfolio return score models likely settlement value, lender propensity to defend, regulatory route probability, and processing timeline. This is the primary score a funder uses to price a portfolio draw.
🛂
Passport Intelligence Score
Composite Per-Claim Rating
ESP and EPR combine into a single composite Passport Intelligence Score per claim. Portfolio-level PIS distributions give a funder an immediate, standardised view of claim quality concentration across the book.
📄
Automated Document Generation
Court and FOS Ready
Letters of authority, FOS submissions, and claim documents are generated automatically from the scored record. A funder can assess document completion rates as a proxy for portfolio readiness without requesting file packs.
🏦
FOS Integration
Ombudsman Pipeline
Direct FOS integration means bulk submissions are tracked at platform level. Submission status, response receipt, and FOS provisional decision data feed back into the platform record, updating scores automatically.
Bulk Processing at Scale
1.4M Claims Per Month
The platform operates at 1.4 million claims per month with 7% monthly growth. A funded portfolio of 10,000 or 100,000 claims does not represent a processing challenge. It represents a normal Tuesday morning for the OCC infrastructure.
📡
Regulatory Scheme Routing
Live Routing Intelligence
Platform logic applies current regulatory criteria across all active claim types, routing claims between scheme, FOS, and court tracks automatically. When FCA conduct findings, court rulings, or redress scheme activations change the routing picture, recalculation happens at platform level and surfaces in ClaimWatch immediately. Portfolio routing is live, not static.
📊
Cross-Portfolio Benchmarking
Platform-Wide Intelligence
Every firm on the platform is scored to the same standard using the same methodology. As a funder, you can benchmark any funded portfolio against platform-wide PIS distributions, processing velocity averages, and settlement rate data across all participating firms. You see not just how strong a portfolio is in absolute terms, but exactly where it sits relative to the broader market. Intelligence only available because every firm runs on the same infrastructure.
04

ClaimWatch: your live eyes on every portfolio

ClaimWatch is the portfolio monitoring function within the ClaimPassports platform. It is specifically designed to give funders, operators, and senior stakeholders a live view of claim book health across all firms in their portfolio. Not aggregated summaries. Not firm-prepared reports. Live data pulled from the same platform the solicitor uses to process their files.

ClaimWatch · Monitoring Layer
What you see, every day.
  • Live claim count and active volume by firm, by claim type, and by lender cohort
  • Score distribution across the portfolio: PIS bands updated as claims progress
  • Document generation completion rates as a readiness proxy
  • FOS submission pipeline: submitted, pending, responded, escalated
  • Regulatory routing split: scheme, FOS, and court track per cohort across all claim types
  • Drop-off rate monitoring with alerts for material changes above threshold
  • ESP and EPR score drift tracking: claims moving up or down the evidential ranking
  • Lender response pattern intelligence: hardening, softening, or no-change per lender
  • Operational capacity signals: intake velocity, processing lag, exception queue depth
ClaimPassports · Funder Access
What you control.
  • Funder read-level access to live portfolio dashboards across all funded firms
  • Cross-portfolio comparison: score distribution benchmarked across your entire book
  • Cohort segmentation: motor finance, packaged accounts, energy, and 12 live claims products across 35 sub-products
  • Portfolio-level Passport Intelligence Score: aggregate and per-firm weighted score
  • Draw-down readiness assessment tied directly to live score data
  • Monthly portfolio reports generated automatically from platform data
  • Material adverse change alerts: early warning before a problem surfaces in a board pack
  • Data export in structured formats for integration into your own reporting stack
  • Historical score trend data for post-draw performance attribution
The key distinction: ClaimWatch data is not prepared by the firm you funded. It is produced by the same AI engine that processes every claim in real time. What you see in ClaimWatch is what is actually in the platform, not what the firm chose to include in its report to you. That distinction is the difference between oversight and dependency.
03.1

Passport Intelligence Score bands

A
Premium
High evidential strength. Strong EPR. FOS or court-ready. First-priority draw cohort.
B
Standard
Solid evidence base. Good expected return. Core portfolio. Eligible for standard draw terms.
C
Review
Incomplete evidence or lower EPR. Requires remediation before draw inclusion. Monitored actively.
D
Excluded
Insufficient evidential basis or regulatory ineligibility. Excluded from funded cohort automatically.
05

What the platform gives you at each stage

ClaimPassports delivers specific, actionable data at each stage of the funding lifecycle. The table below maps the platform's capability to each phase of your engagement with a funded firm.

Funding Stage Your Typical Position Without the Platform What ClaimPassports Delivers Status
Pre-commitment Due Diligence Firm-prepared portfolio summary. Sample file review. Sector averages for EPR benchmarking. Subjective quality assessment. Live ESP and EPR scored portfolio export. PIS band distribution. Document completion rates. Intake velocity and processing speed metrics. Independent of firm narrative. LIVE
Draw Approval Management accounts. Solicitor confirmation of active claim count. Estimated value per claim from firm. Platform-verified active claim count. Score-band segmentation for draw cohort. Automated draw-readiness report from live data. No firm input required for the data layer. LIVE
Post-Draw Monitoring Monthly management reports. Quarterly site visits. Ad hoc calls when something goes wrong. ClaimWatch live dashboard. Daily score drift monitoring. Drop-off alerts. Submission pipeline status. Regulatory routing split. Lender response intelligence. LIVE
Portfolio Comparison No standardised cross-firm data. Different reporting formats from each firm. Impossible to compare like-for-like. Identical scoring methodology applied across all firms on the platform. Cross-portfolio PIS benchmarking. Concentration risk visibility by claim type and lender. LIVE
Regulatory Scheme Change Firm notifies you weeks after the regulatory development. No automated recalibration of your portfolio exposure. Platform logic applies regulatory updates across all active claim types automatically. Whether FCA redress scheme changes, FOS policy shifts, or court rulings, routing recalculation happens at platform level and surfaces in ClaimWatch immediately across every funded product in the portfolio. LIVE
Recovery Attribution Settlement data reported by firm. No independent verification of recovery rates against scored cohort. Settlement outcomes fed back into platform records. Recovery rates calculated against original PIS band for attribution analysis. Historical performance data available for future pricing. READY
06

Risks mitigated when ClaimPassports is mandatory

When you mandate ClaimPassports as a condition of funding, you are not adding a platform requirement to your term sheet. You are removing a category of risk from your portfolio that currently has no structural solution.

Risk Category How It Manifests Without the Platform How ClaimPassports Eliminates It Severity
Portfolio Overstatement Firms include unscored, incomplete, or low-quality claims in the draw request cohort. You discover this post-deployment when claims fail at FOS or lender stage. Only platform-scored claims with a PIS of B or above are eligible for draw inclusion. The scoring engine is independent of the firm's assessment. HIGH
Operational Failure A funded firm hits a processing bottleneck, outsources badly, or loses key staff. Your portfolio stalls. You find out in the next management report. ClaimWatch intake velocity and exception queue metrics provide a live operational health signal. Material slowdowns trigger alerts before they become portfolio events. HIGH
Regulatory Mispricing A scheme change, court ruling, or FCA conduct finding shifts the value profile of an entire lender cohort. Firms cannot recalculate fast enough and do not tell you promptly. Platform scoring recalibrates automatically as regulatory and evidential data updates. PIS scores shift in the live dashboard before the firm has written a single email to you. HIGH
Concentration Risk Blindness You fund multiple firms with large books against the same lender. Aggregate exposure is invisible because each firm reports independently. Cross-portfolio ClaimWatch dashboards show aggregate lender exposure across all funded firms in a single view. Concentration thresholds can be monitored at portfolio level. MEDIUM
Document Readiness Risk A draw cohort contains claims where documentation is incomplete or incorrect. Cases fail at submission stage, not at resolution stage. Recovery rates fall. Document generation completion rates are visible at claim level in ClaimWatch. No claim with incomplete documentation can be included in a draw cohort without a flag. MEDIUM
Compliance Exposure A firm in your portfolio processes claims outside regulatory standards without your knowledge. Your capital is associated with the conduct. The platform operates to FCA CONC 4.2, Consumer Credit Act Section 140A, and applicable regulatory standards across all active claim types as embedded platform logic. Every claim processed on the platform follows a compliant, auditable workflow regardless of claim category. MEDIUM
07

The mandate argument: why this is a condition, not a recommendation

You would not fund a property portfolio without a surveyor's report. You should not fund a claims portfolio without ClaimPassports scoring.

A surveyor's report is mandatory in property funding not because the firm you are lending to is dishonest, but because the asset being financed requires independent assessment to be fundable at all. ClaimPassports occupies the same structural position in claims portfolio financing. It is the independent assessment layer that turns a solicitor's claim book into a fundable, monitorable, and computable asset. Without it, you are pricing a subjective view of a pipeline. With it, you are pricing a scored, standardised, live data set. The difference is not comfort. The difference is information.

Adding ClaimPassports as a condition of funding does three things simultaneously: it improves your due diligence before commitment; it gives you live oversight after deployment; and it raises the operational standard of the firms in your portfolio. These are not costs to the firm. A firm running ClaimPassports processes more claims, more accurately, with less headcount, than a firm without it. The mandate pays for itself in the first month of operation.

Independent scoring
Live portfolio visibility
Standardised data across firms
Regulatory routing built in
No firm-prepared reporting dependency
Operational health monitoring
Draw-readiness by platform data

The practical mechanism is simple. You add a single clause to your facility agreement: all claims processed under the funded portfolio must be onboarded and maintained on the ClaimPassports platform, with funder read-level access granted to OCC's ClaimWatch dashboard as a condition of each draw request. OCC manages the platform. You retain continuous visibility.

08

Licensing, access, and commercial structure

ClaimPassports is a single platform. There are no tiers. For funded portfolios, OCC offers a Funder Partnership structure that includes ClaimWatch dashboard access, portfolio-level reporting, and a dedicated account relationship. Pricing is discussed directly with OCC.

Tier Volume Range ClaimWatch Access Funder Dashboard
ClaimPassports Single platform, no volume tiers. Handles any portfolio size. Processing capacity of 1.4 million claims per month. Full ClaimWatch suite. Live score distribution. Document completion. Drop-off alerts. Regulatory routing split. Lender cohort breakdown. Cross-portfolio benchmarking and data export. FULL ACCESS
Funder Partnership Pricing: OCC offers a dedicated Funder Partnership arrangement for litigation funders who mandate ClaimPassports across their portfolio. This includes preferential ClaimWatch access, aggregated cross-portfolio dashboards, and a commercial framework structured for multi-firm deployment. Contact OCC directly for a confidential partnership discussion.
09

The regulatory moment and what it means for funders

The UK claims market does not sit still. Regulatory conduct findings, FOS policy shifts, court rulings, and redress scheme activations continuously reshape the value and routing of claim portfolios across every category. The FCA motor finance redress scheme under PS26/3 is one current example: a major regulatory event compressing significant claim volume into a defined settlement window and requiring rapid portfolio recalibration as the scheme, the court omnibus track, and the constitutional vires challenge develop in parallel. It is one of many. Packaged bank account claims, pension mis-selling, consumer credit, SME energy, and commercial litigation each carry their own regulatory and evidential dynamics that shift the value of a funded portfolio without warning.

For a litigation funder, the risk is not that you pick the wrong claim type. The risk is that the picture changes after you commit and you have no live mechanism to see it happening. A firm running ClaimPassports gives you that mechanism across every product in its book, not just the headline category. When a conduct finding moves the EPR score on a lender cohort, you see it in ClaimWatch before the firm has written you an email. When a regulatory routing decision shifts volume from the scheme track to the court track, the portfolio recalculates automatically. That is the intelligence infrastructure that removes retrospective surprise from funded portfolio management.

10

Commercial litigation: a growing market on the same infrastructure

Business commercial litigation is one of the fastest growing segments in UK litigation funding. Breach of contract, director and officer liability, professional negligence, shareholder disputes, insolvency-related claims, and SME financial mis-selling all represent funded claim categories where institutional capital is increasingly active and where the same data infrastructure requirements apply. ClaimPassports processes commercial litigation claims on the same platform, using the same ESP and EPR scoring engines, producing the same PIS banded portfolio output that the consumer financial claims books generate.

Why commercial litigation needs platform infrastructure
The same problem, larger ticket.
  • Commercial claims carry higher individual values but equivalent evidential complexity. ESP scoring applies to commercial claim types with product-specific weighting for contract strength, causation evidence, and defendant balance sheet capacity.
  • Multi-party commercial disputes and group actions require the same portfolio segmentation and cohort management that the platform delivers for consumer books at volume.
  • Commercial claim portfolios are as subject to regulatory and judicial shifts as consumer ones. Court of Appeal decisions, FCA conduct findings on commercial products, and insolvency law developments all affect portfolio return in real time.
  • Funders backing commercial litigation firms without live data monitoring face the same retrospective information problem as consumer funders. ClaimWatch applies identically to commercial portfolios.
Commercial claim categories on the platform
Active across the book.
  • Breach of contract and commercial mis-selling claims against financial institutions and service providers
  • Director and officer liability, including breach of fiduciary duty and wrongful trading
  • Professional negligence against solicitors, accountants, financial advisers, and surveyors
  • Shareholder and partnership disputes, including unfair prejudice petitions
  • Insolvency-related claims including antecedent transactions and misfeasance
  • SME financial product mis-selling including interest rate hedging products and business interruption insurance
  • Commercial property and landlord disputes at volume

The commercial litigation market is growing because institutional funders have recognised that the evidential and return profile of well-scored commercial claims is at least as strong as consumer financial claims at portfolio scale, with the added advantage that settlement values are typically higher per matter and defendant capacity is more predictable. ClaimPassports is the infrastructure layer that makes a mixed consumer and commercial claim book fundable under a single access licence. A funder holding a ClaimWatch access licence sees the full portfolio, both consumer financial claims and commercial litigation, in one dashboard with identical scoring methodology applied throughout.

The mixed-book advantage: A solicitor firm running both consumer financial claims and commercial litigation on ClaimPassports presents a funder with a diversified, cross-category portfolio that reduces concentration risk and smooths settlement timing across the book. ClaimWatch surfaces that diversification in the portfolio dashboard automatically. No additional configuration is required.
OCC Software Limited · Litigation Funder Partnership

Make ClaimPassports the infrastructure standard for every firm you fund.

Speak with OCC about the Funder Partnership structure, ClaimWatch access, and how to incorporate ClaimPassports as a condition of your facility agreements. Confidential discussions welcome at any stage.